But can this be a bad thing?
Here are the numbers: in 2010, there were approximately 1,800 breweries operating in the US. This includes brewpubs, large breweries and non-craft breweries. In 2011, this number increases to about 2040 breweries, not including closures (of which there were 35). Over 2,000 breweries in the country in 2011, all pumping out beer, all needing one thing: ingredients.
An industry that relies on a purely agricultural product to survive cannot be sustainable forever. At least, not while experiencing record growth. There is only so much land on which to grow food to eat, much less to boil it down, ferment, and consume the dregs. Our land is shrinking to strip malls and condos, and the products we rely on to make beer shrink with them. Take the US Hop Crop, for example: The acreage of hop farms in Washington, Idaho, and Oregon (the three states we rely on the most for hops) shrank last year by a combined 16%. Imagine that - the farms that we rely on for our hops are now smaller than they were last year, by a good chunk. Now, yields have risen by 80 pounds or so, but when the total crop is down almost a million pounds over last year, 80 seems like a very small number. We all remember the "hop crisis", when the average size of the hop farms decreased by about 9,000 acres (and the price per pound rose but never really seemed to fall?). With this giant growth of craft beer, are we going to be able to get the hops we need for our own beer making?
Then you move on to Barley. Most of the barley that we get here in the US comes from our buddy, The Great White North (most of our crop is 6-row, which we don't really use in craft beer). In 2008, the production was around 11,700 kMT. Shift to 2010, when production fell to just around 8,200 kMT.
So here's my question to the craft beer world: When will the bottom drop out? There has to be a limit, and for years we all speculated that the ultimate factor would be the consumer, where they would simply stop trying new beers and stick with the few brands they enjoy today. But more and more it seems likely that the new growth will be governed by the availability of resources - namely malt and hops.
And here's a question to the homebrewers out there: we are already limited on our selection of barley an hops (though you don't know that) due to contracts signed by craft brewers extending for years and totaling into the millions of dollars. So what happens when the almost 250 breweries that are waiting in the wings in California alone come online, demanding their share of two crops that have been in steady decline for the last 3-5 years? Will homebrewers see a rise in prices - again? Look at the trends - large breweries opening second brew houses - not just expanding, building new facilities. Sierra Nevada alone is doing a pint night at a bar where 55 taps will be SN beers. Think about that. Really think about how much malt, how much hops it takes to make 55 batches of individual beer styles, on a scale like that. And you think you are worried now about not finding Amarillo ...
Just some thoughts I had while on the phone with my buddy Sean Paxton, talking about new emerging styles of beer and the future of craft beer. I give it 5 years and then, if you don't have your contracts etched in stone, or your brewery isn't in more than 4 markets ... you're out.
I've had a few sources of info for this stuff, but the two I found most useful were the following:
http://www.brewerssupplygroup.com/FileCabinet/2010%20Harvest%20Report.pdf
http://www.usahops.org/graphics/File/Statistics/National%20Hop%20Report-NASS%2012-11.pdf
This is just my interpretation of the numbers. I could be wrong.
This post written under the influence of Hank III